📌 Many cities are now turning parks and farmland into new housing developments.
Is this a positive or negative development?
More samples on IELTS2.com
The rapid transformation of urban green spaces and agricultural land into residential areas is a prevalent trend in many cities worldwide. While this development is often driven by pressing housing needs, I believe it is largely a negative development due to its detrimental long-term consequences for the environment and societal well-being.
Proponents of this trend argue that it is a necessary response to the critical shortage of affordable housing, exacerbated by population growth and rural-to-urban migration. By increasing the housing supply, cities can potentially curb soaring property prices and accommodate their growing populations. Furthermore, new developments often feature modern infrastructure, which can be an upgrade from older, sometimes substandard, housing stock, thereby improving living conditions for some residents.
However, the drawbacks of this practice are profound and far-reaching. Primarily, the loss of parks and public green spaces severely impacts the quality of urban life. These areas are vital “lungs” for a city, providing recreational space, reducing air pollution, and mitigating the urban heat island effect. Their disappearance can lead to a decline in residents’ physical and mental health. Similarly, converting farmland threatens local food security. Relying on increasingly distant sources for food increases transportation costs, carbon emissions, and vulnerability to supply chain disruptions. This loss also damages biodiversity, destroys natural habitats, and reduces the land’s ability to absorb rainwater, potentially increasing flood risks.
In my opinion, the negative implications outweigh the short-term benefits. The destruction of essential green and agricultural land represents a unsustainable trade-off that sacrifices long-term environmental health and livability for immediate, often poorly planned, housing solutions. A more positive approach would be for city planners to prioritise brownfield development—building on disused industrial land—and promoting high-density, vertical housing projects. Additionally, investing in urban regeneration and improving public transport to connect satellite towns can alleviate pressure on city centres without sacrificing precious green lungs and food-producing land.
In conclusion, while addressing the housing crisis is imperative, it should not come at the cost of the very elements that make a city healthy and sustainable. Preserving parks and farmland is crucial for the long-term resilience and well-being of urban populations.
More 2025 IELTS Essays for You
- Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become
- In many countries, people now wear western-style dress
- Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become
- آهنگ گفتار (intonation) در اسپیکینگ آیلتس
- Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become
- دانلود pdf کتاب IELTS Speaking
- Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become
- Some people think that school children need to learn practical skill
- عبارت اسمی در زبان انگلیسی (با ۳۰ مثال)
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier
تصحیح رایگان رایتینگ شما در کانال تلگرام ما
